Reading without documenting is like cooking without a recipe.
You get it right once — and can never reproduce it.
A systematic template solves this by forcing you to:
Bad summaries copy the abstract. Good summaries use your own words and your own judgement.
"We propose K-RagRec, a novel framework that retrieves high-quality and up-to-date structure information from the knowledge graph to augment recommendations."
This is just the abstract. Zero understanding demonstrated.
"The core bet is that graph structure (not just text) is what LLMs need for RS. They use multi-hop GNN indexing to encode neighbourhood context — removing this drops accuracy by 45%, so the GNN is the actual contribution."
Shows the reader understood and evaluated the paper.
The best moment to document is while reading — not the day after. Observations decay fast.
RULE OF THUMB
If you can't fill the Relevance row, either the paper isn't relevant — or you haven't thought hard enough about why you're reading it.
You already have a template — the Excel file from M2 has all 6 fields ready. Paper 01 is waiting for K-RagRec.
Six fields. Done during Pass 2. Written in your own words — not copied from the abstract.
The weaknesses row is where your next research idea lives. Never leave it empty.
A note without a relevance connection is an island. Force yourself to draw the line to your own work.
Next: M3 · L2 — The Literature Matrix